|
HOME | CONTENTS NEWS UPDATES FISHING TIPS ARTICLES PUBLICATIONS GALLERY LINKS | JOIN HERE | |||||
ABOUT PACREGIONSFEEDBACKEVENTS NEWS FEEDABOUT PIKESEARCH | |||||||
THE ORIGINS OF MODERN PIKING Barrie Rickards explains how some piking tackle and techniques developed from the '50s to the present day.
I didn't like gags. I didn't think - and don't think - that they were any more damaging to pike than large hooks or the perch the pike preyed upon. But they were inefficient. One of my waters at the time - Eastring Tarn in East Yorkshire - produced for me a lot of pike from 1/2lb - 3 1/2lbs on lures, and a few bigger fish. Even the smallest gag available seemed difficult to insert into the jaw, and on small fish they did do damage. One day I forgot the gag! With a 2lb pike on the bank, and a lure well inside its mouth. I wondered what to do. In the end, for some reason, I put my left index finger in under the gill cover and lifted up the pike. I was staggered to see its mouth open! As soon as I wielded the pliers it closed its mouth on them, but I quickly learned that a push with the finger opened it again. Never again did I use gags. It was quite a party trick to demonstrate unhooking this way, with any size of pike. Anglers in the 1960s who saw it demonstrated were, firstly, amazed and, secondly, quick to latch on to it. Ray Webb didn't, as a matter of fact, and he was still using the gag when he retired from angling. In
fact I did three things in the 1950s that caused heads to turn. Not only
did I use my new unhooking method, but I used a landing net! And I
put pike back. I'm not saying I invented returning pike, because that was already
happening in the Norfolk Broads and Slapton Ley, for example. But elsewhere in
the country it certainly caused comment. I can tell you! And as for
landing nets, well! Everybody thought landing nets would have holes
bitten in them by the pike (ditto keepnets, which I also used extensively). Pike
anglers today do seem to forget that almost all pike caught in the 1950s were
killed. A few pioneers changed things, slowly, slowly. Nowadays I think it would
be fair to say that most pike are returned. Hook-rigs and the manner of striking also received our attention. Hooks were stupidly large, and the trace wire at least four times as thick as modern trace wires of the thickest kind! Ray opted for using only one such treble, or rather small ones. I went for small multihook rigs (a la Dave Steuart), either two or four depending on the bait. But by the late 1960s I had concluded that two size 6 or 8 trebles were really all that was needed to do the job well. Bill Chillingworth and I looked hard at the hook rigs, especially the question of a fixed or moving Ryder on a snap tackle. Fixed hooks were coming into vogue, encouraged by Richard Walker. Our conclusion after extensive trials was that the moving Ryder was better on all counts. It is still our view today. The fixed upper hook serves no useful purpose and is one of those nice-sounding ideas that is actually wrong. I suppose the other common sight in 1950s piking was that of the pike bung, with a bait fishing two or three feet below it. And, of course, one to three pilot floats on the line above the bung. Seems quaint now! The chain of pilot floats was a left over from the days when lines sank very quickly, i.e. the pilot floats were used to prevent sinking line close to the bung from fouling the bait. With the advent of nylon monofil, pilot floats disappeared - except that they made superb pike floats. I'm very pleased to see that Marvic still do them! Anglers such as Dave Steuart were using paternoster rigs and sliding floats, I think in the early '60s. By the mid-'60s we were all using them. Once again it was one of those things that puzzled many Anglers: how come you can fish sixteen feet of water and your float stay in place! Paternoster rigs really did transform piking, and the development of good sliding floats was a Godsend. I always made my own tapered ones out of balsa, but I used round 'pilot' floats as often as not. I still do use them. Deadbait rigs were a headache for a long time. Fred J. Taylor did the pioneer work, but with the benefit of hindsight those rigs were a bit crude. I never saw Walker's own pike rigs, but from his descriptions of them, fuse wire and all, they must have been unnecessarily crude too. Fred's rigs worked quite well, but we modified them as described in 'Fishing for Big Pike‘. I tried all manner of hook set-ups in the late 1950s and early 1960s (including, incidentally, barbless hook rigs!) and eventually settled, by about 1966, for the ordinary simple, snap tackle (home made, and with the wire about a foot long).
On a different
tack altogether I developed things which benefited the pike angler rather than
the pike, such as rig bins and roll-up holdalls. Rig bins of this style are still
with us I'm happy to say. They came about in a very strange way. Ray turned up
one Boxing Day with his rigs wound around a Xmas Yule log! I immediately saw the
advantages of this, and two weeks later had made one that fitted neatly into a
dried milk tin. I still have it, and it's as good today as it was then! It's a
very neat way of storing rigs and I'm pleased to see that many firms make them.
(I don't recall ever getting any credit, mind you!). This article first appeared in Pikelines
76 (May 1997 - the 20th Anniversary edition)
- on this website 16/1/04 |
HOME | CONTENTS NEWS UPDATES FISHING TIPS ARTICLES PUBLICATIONS GALLERY LINKS | JOIN HERE | |||||
ABOUT PACREGIONSFEEDBACKEVENTS NEWS FEEDABOUT PIKESEARCH | |||||||